Monday, December 14, 2009

Copenhagen - Climate Change: the advantages of a political agreement over a legally binding one

An ambitious political agreement re Climate Change would probably be better than a less ambitious legally binding one, the latter would be "policed quite effectively by world public opinion". I fully agree with this point of view, as expressed by Graham Watson, Member of European Parliament (Liberal Democrats, ALDE) in "Graham Reports from Copenhagen;
Update Monday 4th December PM".
in his blog www.grahamwatsonmep.org

Inter alia, Mr. Watson writes:

"...This must be the first time world public opinion has mobilised so effectively, putting pressure on the government leaders to act ....

... Will the commitments be legally binding? It may be better if they are not, since in that case they will be less ambitious. A political agreement would probably be policed quite effectively by world public opinion."

I believe that Mr. Watson's rationale is right on the mark.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Hi there,

Feel free to comment.
Only suitable comments will be posted.
In EN, FR, GR, D, IT, SP, NL only (Use Google Translate otherwise SVP).

Thanks.
BRs
Nick

Share/Bookmark